This has never been news that the newspaper business is in big trouble.
Reporter: "Rocky Mountain News," existing
For 150 years, is publishing the latest edition today. </ P>
A big newspaper is dead. </ P>
Denver can't support two more newspapers </ p >
Reporter # 2: This is a bleak race to see who comes first.
"Philadelphia Daily News" and Minneapolis "Star Tribune"
both are in bankruptcy.
"Boston Globe" and "San Francisco Chronicle" has lost...
"Seattle Post-Intelligencer," </ p >
the biggest daily newspaper hasn't been out of business...
Tribune company, owner of "LA Times"
and "Chicago Tribune" filed for bankruptcy...
And the Gannett Company faltered...
All the news is right to print for 88 years...
After 146 years, the print edition Now is a thing of the past...
The "Gray Lady" suffers...
Women's shares: "New York Times" not active more than 75%...
Man: "The New York Times"... "The New York Times," are you kidding me?
Obituary column < br /> full today
from the death notice American daily newspaper
So there is a death watch on "The New York Times" </ p >
as long as I cover the media.
People are rather fascinated with what happened
to be the death of from this great institution. </ p >
And that hasn't come yet, and it's not here yet,
but it's not reduced Certainty of people that it will come.
Okay, I see this as a big story.
I might be able to get a significant space.
What do you think is the story? is that what I have to say?
Carr: Lately when I finished an interview,
most subjects have their own questions:
What will happen in "The New York Times"?
Even ordinary followers from the newspaper industry
can babble Judgment tick gecko
Bruce Headlam.
Headlam: As much as we want to flatter ourselves yourself,
It's still like this old school business
I'm a Media Editor.
You know, trees are still cut
and the newspaper is still delivered
I just think it helps us sort of be in the mix.
- Yeah yeah - Good.
Carr: No need to worry, < /> recommend new media prophets.
The end of "The New York Times" will not be as big as the agreement,
they say, because of tweets, blogs and news aggregators
can make new apparatus from accountability
Say it again?
But there are some stories outside the database
Sometimes people have to make a call,
hit the street and walk past it conventional wisdom.
Richard Pérez-Peña: Alright, believe me, if your number is better
than anyone else I will write it
I'm just always skeptical when everyone tells me
that number doesn't mean what they mean, you know
Because everyone gave me that line, so I didn't receive it from anyone.
The collapse of the ad happened faster
than anticipated. </ P>
This year in 2009,
already around 30% decrease in advertising revenue,
above about 17% last year's decline,
and no one knows where it ended
Maybe it's something very permanent has changed
Two things have happened to "The Times," I think in a way, the most important thing. </ P>
First thing what happened, Famous, is the advertising market
has been reversed. So at the same time time as income takes a hit,
arrives- arrived suddenly has changed from
something is done by a special class
to be something that is literally
every citizen connected has access to
So that authoritative tone with him "The Times" always talks
now is one of the many votes on the market
And that reduction in advertising revenue
coupled with competition for attention... both at the same time...
has changed this from the transition to a revolution.
So it's about WikiLeaks, which is a website that calls itself
an intelligence agency for the people.
And yesterday they posted the video of this US attack,
an air strike, where there 12 people were killed.
The government claims at this time is a rebel,
But it turns out there are two Reuters employees
and then some other unknown people
WikiLeaks somehow from anonymous sources
get the video and put it on YouTube.
It feels like maybe front page story for Bruce and me
So now basically the task < br /> for the rest of the day
is to save the story interesting to the editors
We try to do the front page the story of what this means,
and what this means for journalism.
Obviously this is good for reporters several ways, because it's out there,
but that's how Two world collisions,
like this closed world old expertise
and classification and information and privacy
and just this new world type wants to solve everything open.
You know, we see it for ourselves. We are a perfect example
of the type of culture that, you know, is experiencing
what we are doing is really torn open.
So this... hey, did you send it?
Alright, I understand. Thank you. See you
This... this is watching people get killed
with very graphic way in war
and hear the reaction from the army.
Man # 3: Roger.
Man # 3 : Roger. </ P>
Stelter: I didn't see that... the van was upside down. </ P>
I didn't pay attention last time. </ P>
Oh my, how terrible the story.
Here's the "nut graph": "Iraqi video release
is a clear buildup of on the site,
which aims to take advantage of from global internet reach
and to bring it to hidden light < br /> information about the government
and multinational companies. "
They don't have it to lower this on the front steps
from NBC News or" The New York Times. "
They just dropped it on Youtube
and waited for for others to find it. </ P>
Headlam: Even with "The Pentagon Papers,"
they must be delivered by hand and they can stop the pressure.
This, they only took it and they only
put it on up there where everyone can see it.
- Nixon: Hello - Haig: yes sir
Nixon: Hi, Al, something new before you today?
Haig: very important... the exhibition "New York Times" this damn </ p >
the most high war documents
Nixon: Alright, damn it, I won't have it.
Haig: I mean, can "The Times" be sued?
Nixon: Look, as far as "The Times" In question, hell, they are our enemies.
I think we are just oughta do and still, no
from "The New York Times" to talk to.
Alex Jones: his decision to published "The Pentagon Papers"
was when when the American news media
stood up and said, "We are independent of the presidency
and we will do what we think is the right thing to do. "
Woman: Do you feel, Mr. Sulzberger, that national security
is endangered, as charged by the administration?
Of course not. </ P>
This paper, I think like our editorial word this morning,
is really part of... part of history
that has to be available
much longer ago,
and I just don't feel
there is a violation < br /> national security
in the sense we give secrets to the enemy.
Reporter: Julian Assange, editor for WikiLeaks,
deny that the site has put soldiers in danger
Reporter # 2: Assange is clear an advocate and war opponent.
Assange made a name for himself as a hacker,
and captured for computer crime
before starting the whistleblower site .
Julian Assange: We want to see the revelation
that this material is investigated by the government,
and new policies
is applied as a result, if it is not prosecution
because I have not heard returned from him at all
Assange: Hello? </ p >
Hi, this is Brian Stelter calling from "The Times."
There is a traditional definition of from journalism that is objective,
really legal, never break up law to get content
Do you see yourself as trying to reach that definition,
atau definisi Anda Jurnalisme lebih luas?
And tell me what is the purpose. Tell me what the goal is.
I don't know what is he doing good or bad
I mean, clear, you know, in open society,
you know, information is, you know, it's important.
It's important for people to make decisions.
On the other hand, there are many things that can get people in trouble.
The video was edited by
It doesn't show the full story.
It was presented as journalism,
But already, you know, an agenda.
It's a "reporter" a word you attach to yourself ?
Good.
The video has been edited so far
that you really have It's hard to know the larger context.
Yes, there is.
- So they have both, don't they? - They do both, it's true.
But the unedited version clearly shows a man carrying an RPG.
They switched from being a clearinghouse to become advocacy.
This is a big decision they made
to suddenly edit 30 minutes.
- Have you written separately about this? - We, us.
I have never heard of it WikiLeaks before then.
Dan I think maybe many of my colleagues are also not.
That's the time This is rather exploding
into the broader public view.
- Hey hey, did you send it? - Stelter: Oh, I see...
- ada catatan di sana - Apakah kamu?
I didn't see it from you. I'll open it.
He's lying.
Oh, he didn't send it. I know he didn't send it.
Headlam: There are two A1 meetings.
There are 10:30 where we discuss the story today,
what we will offer And there is 4:00,
when the top editor make that decision
That's all the head of the table, or at least someone from each table.
You make your offer and they ask questions.
Then they decide what they want to use in the paper the next day.
You know, It's a kind of competition.
You go in there and many people want stories
dan kita berjuang untuk naik A1. Tapi ini sangat konstruktif berkelahi.
Man: Alright, friend, We are still waiting for some people
but I think we can start. First, I think... Bruce.
This is our follow up on the video released yesterday on the web.
We see WikiLeaks, which is the organization that leaked it.
I think that very interesting moments for them
They have gained a lot of fame because of Baghdad videos.
As indicated by lan, they have installed it Raw recordings , which is 38 minutes.
They have also installed the edited version, That's what many people see,
and there are already people in the army and on the spot others say
that this really distorts what really happened there
And when they go to get a corpse, they find a man with an RPG,
So it's like what Bruce said, This becomes an advocacy. Now ..
Fisher: There, yeah. I just talked to...
They might be in the same place.
- Fisher: forgive me - They might belong
in one type coherent overall, right?
- Fisher: Sure - Headlam: Yeah, right also.
Chira: In the Page-One meeting, the most senior editor
see the summary from the story itself
and say , "Have you properly frame it?
Does this seem loaded? Do you have enough facts to support this?"
Dan finally people present their arguments
pros and cons and building sides.
Oh, the West Bank story.
Hmmm.
I don't think the whole country is interested on Sharpe James.
- No. - Swing Sharpe and West Bank?
The West Bank will have big readers here
- Yeah, I won't swing it. - Swing it with WikiLeaks? </ P>
- Uh huh. - Okay, swing it with WikiLeaks. </ P>
Let's leave story in the West Bank.
It will swing, which means in New York it will go inside,
but for the whole country it will go in front page
You know, you saw for now where
Daniel Ellsberg: When I gave "The Pentagon Papers" became "The Times,"
there is a 22 month period from the start of my copy
Is the internet at that time,
I will buy the scanner, send it to all blogs.
but at least it definitely comes out.
don't need us
Daniel Ellsberg does it.
The old newspaper model is dying.
Period. Completed News isn't dying
Much cheaper news to produce now
because we can gather and share in new ways,
Something extraordinary < br /> new ways to do news
There are no questions there is still a lot of
information out there,
And if you think about the history of from these institutions...
Watergate, Abu Ghraib, the Walter Reed scandal...
are these institutions /> bring to bring newsroom
experienced reporters
And I think we are at a dangerous moment in American journalism
The question is whether it's too late for some institutions </ p >
to take advantage of that change and change as much as they have to.
So David Carr came, the most humane,
spoke about how the media operates
in "The New York Times."
Welcome David Carr!
You are a... You are former addict addict
and you're a reporter for "The New York Times."
Which of these two do you think? more damaging to the community?
Carr: If you write about media long enough,
finally you will type your way to your own doorstep
I arrived at "The New York Times" late in my professional life,
and I have immigrants love that place
Chips implanted inside me when I arrived...
let's just say "New York Times" exceptionalism...
led me to conclude that of course we will survive.
You are very good
Then again, after suffering from drug addiction in the 20s and 30s,
landing in prison for possession of cocaine,
raising two children as single parents,
and finally ending at "The New York Times, "
I know how it feels to get out of the other side
if there is a possibility stacked against you
Carr: Hi, I'm looking for Alex.
Receptionist: Sure, you can Go sit on the couch.
- Huh? Good. - He'll be back soon
- Hi. - Man: This is David Carr
- from "The New York Times." - Nice to meet you. </ P>
Don't keep saying I come from "The New York Times." </ P>
That sucks. I just... it's me. </ P>
- Nice to meet you finally. - I'm David
- Nice to meet you - Hi, nice to meet you How are you?
We want to get everyone together to update the entire company.
The media landscape changed in a very dramatic way
in just six months. Print as an industry
and a media continues to swoop
Publications like "Newsweek" and "Times" will drop quickly.
We want to say that we are perfectly positioned
Shane Smith: No only that the biggest type of media company
willing to come talk to us, but the biggest brand
want to come talk to us
and give us money. And what should we do
do we have to find out how we can be more evil and faster
and more dynamic than < everyone is out there
We don't want to get hot and die. We want to get hot and get hotter.
You ask the question is there /> that business model, like...
Only for a moment. I want you to feel me in this matter:
Saya tidak melakukan potret korporat.
What happened to that? You do business with CNN?
We know how to speak for young people
They listen to us. We are a trusted brand for them. </ P>
I mean, the first thing CNN said when they walked
into the meeting Last summer,
"49-year-old kids are watching CNN now,
and we are screwed Please help us grow
new and young audiences for the sake of the future?
They like the way you tell stories. They like your host.
They like where you go. "That's right what what they're looking for.
Reporter: What kind of war is this, guerrilla?
I don't know Liberia.
I don't know what happened . I don't pretend.
I didn't go there to get the news, reported on certain news.
I'm not there to be solved world problems.
I just an ordinary person. I don't fly to something.
I don't have security. I don't have anything
And I've been to several places just fucking & apos; crazy
If you are a CNN viewer and you go, "Hmm,
I see human poop on the beach."
I have to tell you one thing: I'm an ordinary person
and I go to these places and I go,
"Alright, everyone talking to me about cannibalism right? "
Everyone talks to me about cannibalism. Now I start
a lot of nonsense to say that word "cannibalism" and so on... anything.
Everyone talks to me about cannibalism
- So you will kill the child? - Yes.
- And then drink the blood? - Yeah.
That's crazy. So actually... our audience goes,
"That's crazy. Like, that crazy. "
And" The New York Times " meanwhile writing about surfing.
I sat there," Do you know what? I won't talk about surfing.
I will talk about cannibalism because that makes me fucks. "
Wait a minute. Time is up.
Before you go there,
we have a reporter there
reporting genocide after genocide
And only because you put with a fucking safari helmet
and go and see in some shit it doesn't give you
the right to insult what we do.
- So go ahead, continue. - sorry
I'm just saying that I'm not a journalist.
- I'm not there to report - it's clear Continue.
I'm sorry. I'm only talking about, you know,
see what I see there
What's wrong?
Dress like a great Page-One guy. </ P>
- How are you? - Wow, what day
Arango: "The Times" where is that I want to work
from when I was very young
I always had ideas about this place like this kind of magisterial place
where things big happened and finished.
And there was this idea in the past where
got to "The Times" almost like getting a tenure.
And you can do it this career is 30 years long, 40 years
where you go cover politics,
You cover some foreigners, You might write a book.
And that's not the path now.
Women and men, we are now on West 43rd Street
in Midtown Manhattan at headquarters "The New York Times."
They are busy preparing this minute -siap.
This is a honeycomb, head office,
city space Here is a landslide
shaped to the newspaper Monday morning. </ P>
Well, here it is, boy. </ P>
Cooke: That is Turner Catledge. He is the managing editor. </ P>
And I heard from the circulation department a few minutes ago
that we have the biggest distribution of newspapers today
in history from "The New York Times."
Hard news is the expression < br /> "The Times" is almost owned.
NBC, CBS, ABC... the first thing they will do in the morning,
the directors of their program will do it take a look at "The New York Times."
If "The New York Times" has a story about this and that in a distant place,
network will think, "Ah, now we want to send Walter Cronkite there."
David Remnick: When I grew up I read "The Times" every morning. </ p >
And then I read this book Gay Talese, "Kingdom and Strength,"
and went inside this imperial institution
And he only, you know, makes me happy.
I mean there is I have nothing more to do.
"& apos; Time & apos; is a very human institution,
run by figures disabled, men who see things like they can see them.
But it's just as true that & apos; The Times & apos; almost always trying to be fair.
And every day, except labor strikes or hydrogen bombs,
it will appear in 11,464 cities throughout Indonesia
and in all world capitals
50 copies will enter to the White House,
39 copies to Moscow, some smuggled to Beijing,
and editions thick week to the foreign minister in Taiwan,
because he needs & apos; The Times & apos; as necessary evidence
of the existence of the earth,
a pressure barometer, a sanity assessor.
If the world is true It still exists, he knows
it will be recorded every days at & apos; The Times. & apos;
Actually there is something called Effect "The New York Times".
In the world of analog newspapers, there are observable effects;
If on the first day, "The New York Times" ran a piece
on certain stories, political or business problems,
on the second day second-rate newspapers
all will be basically imitating the story
Just like anything else in newspaper business,
We didn't realize it "The New York Times" effect
actually depends on
analog structure mail distribution news
"The Times" still, I am thinking of a Extraordinary degree, indeed setting the agenda.
I mean, you really can track almost all the big stories end - recently
returned to something originally appeared in "The Times."
The problem is is when it's reached
community,
they might not even know it came from "The Times."
Okay, so at 6:00 a.m. release out. Is that true? </ P>
Arango: So for two, three months now...
I think the end of September the story is leaked
that Comcast will buy NBC.
It looks like finally it will be announced
So the challenge is this part I work with Sorkin, </ p >
what we call tick-tock, which one is
fun details behind the scenes how the deal came together.
So I'm just waiting for Andrew to come so we can handle it,
and we will get it in tomorrow's newspaper
By the way, how come the tick-tock came?
Sorkin, I'm just waiting for for him. He's like...
- Did he file anything? - No.
So that means he hasn't written a word.
I don't know Like 11.00, he said,
"I'll have something for you in an hour."
So now I will see like a fool if I don't hit it.
Because of our agreement he will write what he has
and I will write it down.
Do you want me to go to him and say Bruce needs to talk?
- Just say Bruce needs it in 15 minutes. - Fine.
Arango : It's reshaping from the media industry. </ P>
Comcast, which is the biggest cable company,
they see the future and they see what is happening in the media,
and they are worried if young people watch TV online,
will they need to continue paying their cable bill forever on the road?
So they feel like, if they can have as many television shows
and films, they can play a bigger role
In the future, whatever the future is
I want to talk to you.
Can I wait
You will appear? He will come.
Alright, here's the lede. "Secret meeting"...
secret... < br /> "Secret meetings held
1:00 PM the second week of July
in a condominium out-of-the-way along the ninth hole
from the golf course in Sun Valley, Idaho.
Jeffrey Lmmelt gets to the condo first,
trying desperately to avoid seen by Jeff Zucker,
NBC Universal's chief executive
who mingled with other executives in front of the duck pond
just a few hundred meters away and don't know what's going on. "
Alright, here's the story. I called GE now.
- Fine. - So I hope you can like...
- Sort it might tie it together. ... tie it together.
Because basically just all these little weird stories.
And I tried tie it and leave small places to...
- Then how about... - This works for Comcast
if it becomes valuable < br /> lots of money in the future
- Arango: alright - Sorkin: That's basically the concept.
Alright. How many words do you < br /> do we think we have this? It's very long.
- Do you think you can do it in 1500? - Arango: yes
- Do that looks good? Are you happy? - Arango: yes
I mean some of these things might be Too many details, by the way.
- I go a little to the sea. - Yes no, I tighten it.
- He said we have 1500 words. - It is like 1500 words now.
No, no, he said we can have 1500
I will check and tell you if it's different
I have to make sure we got a place
- Headlam: Sorkin have seen it? - Arango : Sorkin just emailed me
and the word file is far away, but said don't put it on the web yet,
because he still needs to confirm something
Arango: Once we can bare it down and tighten it,
I think it reads well. He tries to tell a story
it's not stuck
in financial and the amount is.
This is this kid, 21 years old Brian Stelter, who started a blog,
who did it anonymously so no one will get out of him,
until "The New York Times" outed him as a mere child.
He made his brand and his reputation
by just getting out there and blogging.
Arango: you know, He became this kind of must read
for Brian Williamses in the world.
And I think "The Times" has an idea, "Why don't we hire this person?"
Stelter: A Week After the story appeared,
"The Times" contacted me and asked me to come
and do this interview series
back to back to return with the editor,
see if you "Times" Material, I think.
Arango: you see him /> on his desk and he has
Two laptops and TV open and he chirped,
and he only embodies everything about new media
I don't know why some people < br /> who is the reporter who is not on Twitter
I keep on berating my colleague who is not on it.
This drives me crazy when I hear it colleague I talk about a story
During the day, and I read it on Twitter in the middle of the night.
I'm thinking to myself, "Why is it permitted? "
You know," Why not? On top of the news? "This is 2010.
I still can't forget that feeling
that Brian Stelter is a robot
gathered in the basement from "The New York Times"
to come and destroy me
Here's an entertaining tip :
I'm expensive beer above.
Carr: Welcome to Austin, which city for now
all famous people, economy shake
and grid groan
under inflow from those who are digitally interested
- I might have to forbid you. - No, I agree, I agree. </ P>
I might have to forbid you. </ P>
Both of you will end up with your device on the fence. </ P>
Carr: Twitter entered the lexicon two years ago here,
at that time dear from the conference
Why do you say when you can tweet?
You are reading an article. If you want to tweet about it
or if you want to join a columnist, you can do it there.
Headlines can be sent out on Twitter
It's about finding out what's happening in the world you care about
Carr: Really, what can anyone might find useful
in this frenzied short communication?
But at 52, I gave up, some of the professional needs.
Now almost a year later, there's Twitter </ p >
turning my brain to pulp? No.
It's hard to convince someone that they have to use Twitter
until you get it on it and they use it for 10 days
and they are like, "Oh, this is why it's interesting."
Carr: I'm a narrative on more lots of things at a certain time
than I ever thought possible.
See how many people now...
Carr: I get news today
and how people react to it
in the time taken to wait for coffee at Starbucks
Almost a year, I have begun to understand </ p >
that the true value of this service is
listening to the collective sound of the cable.
Media is not the message.
The message is media.
- Man: Bruce? - Headlam: We always look for ways
to show how cutting in media business has affected coverage.
And Brian Stelter have come up with the impossible,
which is coverage from the President of the United States.
When Obama travels to Buffalo today,
there won't be a charter plane traveling with it
because many networks have opted out
takes a very expensive ride,
and the reason is only the cost.
Uh, we'll call it "press."
Oh good, my source < br /> starts out.
They start to wake up.
This is number one work, of course, for each DC bureau to follow
president and to travel with him on foreign and domestic trips.
But lately there has been fewer from this White House aircraft
who went with President Obama to event.
These people try every day
to save every dollar they get.
This is a demonstration network trying to do more with less.
Or just accept You can only do less.
Sometimes it's the answer... just do a little.
Are 1,500 people on staff now? 1400.
Are you confirming that 300 and 400 numbers are out there?
ABC spawned 400 people. CBS was dismissed 90 weeks ago. </ P>
God, that's amazing. </ P>
20 to 25% of staff they tried to cut
They are not only there to confirm it
The President is not choking on chicken bones
They are also in the corner people for interviews
in a way that they can't do otherwise.
I think something else All you have to do is nod
for what this goes coverage means
in the next few campaigns. In the last election,
because they can't afford to send ordinary reporters,
they send it out 24-year-old child with a video camera.
They catch all kinds of things.
Someone falls asleep and will never sleep < br /> have been caught if they don't have it
some children with video cameras who are bored and shoot everything.
Stelter: He didn't go to make news today, no.
Headlam: No, the last president made the news on Buffalo shot.
Isn't that McKinley?
Don't put that in the paper.
This is what happened at this time:
How did you cover it up? a cheap president?
We've seen
Every, I think, a model you can imagine
All the way from, you know, philanthropists,
You know, you can find a generous foundation
who wants to be redeemed "The New York Times"
for membership
That's an amazing thing. I mean, first
the newspaper was almost giving themselves up.
I mean, they charge far less newspaper printing costs,
and they make differences in advertising
McQuivey: newspaper industry don't see Monster Com
takes the work part away. They don't see
Craigslist takes the line section only.
They don't see Ford and GM make their own site
to take automotive ads basically go forever
Keller: We are now entering the middle of a really troubling time.
The real question is whether newspaper ads
will return to the same level.
Pérez-Peña: Like many companies in this industry,
this one found itself scrambling for cash position.
The company borrowed $ 250 million from Carlos Slim
and was executed a building re-sale,
which is basically like pawning a building
Nobody wants to make any predictions, </ p >
because all the predictions they have have made it very wrong.
There is nothing quite pessimistic.
There is only this kind
decade centric organization
about, you know,
our own superiority
and our own dominance.
And then in a matter from, like, 18 months,
Suddenly there is... the air ionizes the strength...
and everyone starts like asking questions:
Can "The New York Times," like, get out of business?
"The New York Times, " traded for three dollars...
A Sunday newspaper costs more than that part of the" New York Times "share.
There is already, since the famous "Atlantic," you know, "Monthly" story,
There are already open talks "What if & apos; The Times & apos; leave?"
Hirschorn: You know, I don't pretend to be an experienced business reporter,
but definitely see on numbers, it looks
as if they are in danger and that There must be a scenario
where if they don't act fast,
that "The Times" can be go to bankruptcy
And that's what I wrote.
I thought, "Your horse donkey." I think, you know,
"You don't know who you are talking about. You really don't." </ P>
I mean, I think so such articles,
for that to appear on "The Atlantic,"
I think it's fair So stupid "The Atlantic."
I was actually very stunned on the reaction he had that piece.
I'm just... I'm not... I really don't think
that people will be so surprised by that,
because it feels rather clear to me
Please. I mean this is "New York Times" that we are talking about,
and I think that such articles both... I find it just stupid.
There is collective denial
what is happening and that the newspaper is somehow special
and somehow they are public trust
and that they should not fail,
and therefore they will not fail.
And I think disconnection between "cannot fail" and "can't fail"
is the thing I'm trying to to, like, really explode.
"End Times" is good. That's good.
People have been arguing that "The New York Times"
has to go out of business since it was there.
So this old question,
but one that has many the significance of people.
They like it.
I don't think it's an argument it will be very easy to make,
and if yes, I will yawn whoever made it
Copeland: I want the note that none of us is economists.
We are not here to talk about whether
"The Times" is a decent or not institution,
talk about CPMs or the price of the ad.
We are here to talk about what will happen
if "The New York Times" disappears.
How many of you will be happy if "The Times" disappears?
Okay, so we have a sprinkling of hands.
Kami mungkin 10 orang memilih untuk itu.
And how many of you will be disappointed or disappointed?
Okay, wow. I see...
Markos, I will come to you first
If "The Times" doesn't exist anymore, how do you feel about that?
I think there is a perception
that many people liked me who wrote online
cheers of traditional media deaths outlets like "The New York Times."
But people like me just want to /> traditional media
like "The New York Times" to do their work,
to do what they should do.
" The New York Times " helping cheerlead
our way into the war in Iraq
I think many have gone backwards in this traditional media
is because people have lost the belief that the publication
doesn't have hidden motives or agendas
People like me, I have an agenda, and I'm very clear about that.
But "The New York Times," they tried to be something better than that...
Good once, Markos, but here's the problem:
When you make an argument about how
we always fall in the workplace,
You reach back through five years
is very important, reporting hard is good
We are on the ground in Afghanistan. We are on the field in Iraq.
I don't imply that this is a bad job.
I said that to claim it because of you were with "The New York Times"
You have to be taken seriously, I think it's dangerous.
It's kind of a implicit credibility that "The New York Times" brings,
escapes with the war...
pre-war coverage that helped take us into this war
That's because he worked for "The New York Times," so he must be trustworthy.
Reporter: Judy Miller reports, quotes...
Reporter # 2: "The New York Times" brings a not based on
claims from them, including...
Reporter # 3: On the front page from the country record notes,
"The Times" report it Saddam Hussein has launched a...
Weapon of mass destruction. Weapon of mass destruction.
"The Times" has a reporter </ p >
which is very vulnerable
There's a story on "The New York Times" this morning...
We read in "The New York Times" today a story that says
that Saddam Hussein is closer...
They are trying to get certain high quality...
Reporter # 4: < br /> The Bush administration was helped
by the country's leading newspapers, "The New York Times."
Reporter # 5: If "The New York Times" Saddam thought
was on a steep cliff mushroom cloud,
then there was actually no debate.
Seth Mnookin: Judy Miller < br /> someone who is free from this story,
and there is no one there
who is given the power of to control it,
and he is clear must be reinstated
Did you receive that your report was wrong?
True. A handful of stories...
about six or seven of them...
I did before the war
wrong,
and intelligence information
that I am accurate wrong reporting
I think if your source is wrong,
You will be wrong.
But to say that you did it wrong If your source is wrong,
That, as your colleague in "The New York Times" has said,
reduces your role as a journalist no more than a stenographer. </ P>
No , vice versa, I really reject that criticism.
We made a mistake in our coverage
from weapons of mass destruction.
We made a report the level is and at the editing level.
Did he tell the truth?
"The New York Times" can't have a reporter...
And we don't.
At any time "The Times" fails on a serious scale
on a certain story, a big story,
there is a fee
There is a price must be paid.
And of course in the past few years, you've heard people say,
"Well, I no longer need & apos; The Times. & apos; < br /> I can no longer trust & apos; The Times. & apos;
One more Jayson Blair or one more Judy Miller
and you are chipping away at this institution
that everyone is sort of desperate to protect
I think until Jayson Blair,
mereka agak tahan Mereka adalah Teflon.
The Jayson Blair incident happened an embarrassing event.
The reporter was found to report the story
in the places where he was /> does not really exist,
even though the dateline will give an indication that he is there,
takes the story and does not even rewrite them....
written by someone else in another newspaper
Mnookin: He was finally caught
because he plagiarized a story from someone
who had previously been a colleague in "The Times."
He not only took it and paddled the rope around his neck
and, like, go jumping a cliff, you know,
right in front of the eyes,
but he tied it with our feet and tried to pull us off the cliff with him.
As soon as they put it on the front page in that little box...
I still remember that day coming out... Raines's reign ended.
Raines: This system is not set
to catch someone who sets to lie
and to use all means at his disposal
to put false information onto paper.
Mnookin: You went from Howell
to be the most successful editor,
not only in history from "The Times,"
in the history of the newspaper, to be fired.
I'm happy to announce Bill Keller
as the next executive editor.
I aim to increase our ambitions higher than before.
When Bill comes in, he's all about
restore confidence after Howell Raines.
He should have gotten something the ship is back on track.
It's just not In that conversation
you know, there is a way to be an economic crisis in journalism.
And that has happened the dominant event,
I think if you ask him, on his watch
Reporter: darker times be ahead for "Gray Lady."
"The Times" will use Layoffs. </ P>
The paper wants to be cut off 100 jobs from the news staff
at the end of the week. </ P>
We heard that PHK starts today this
We now know how many people
have chosen to go voluntarily,
which means we know how many our people have to lay off.
In the near future, we are cutting
100 people left the staff around 1250.
We have spent a lot of time in last few weeks
went to the list, tried to prioritize
based on skills we were able to lose
We are not a special newspaper, < br /> we are a general newspaper.
And we strive to be the prima donna of on everything from overseas coverage
for educational coverage for art to sports.
You know, we are big, but there are not much slack on the system.
I feel that few days, you know, </ p >
we should be symbolically, you know,
butcher clothes bleed or something around the newsroom.
It's like that
gloomy business
Sinar: I was hired in 1977.
When I was trying to get this job,
a work focus group
asked me to write my own obituary.
And since then, I've been deputy obituary editor.
Hey, this is Claiborne Ray, people retired departing
Should I go down freight elevator
or via ordinary passenger lift
I come with high hopes </ p >
stayed for one year
I have overstayed that for 20 years.
Headlam: We have to throw away too much.
They don't really have a choice.
We all get the package in the mail.
There is something very disappointing
about getting packages by mail
who invited you to leave your job.
I almost felt like I didn't know of everything that happened
and I almost felt like I don't have a clear understanding
on the magnitude of the situation.
Katherine Boulton: I decided not to suppress my luck.
Nobody knows whether there will be paper on paper for another five years.
Everyone Extraordinary pressure to do
more than anyone really can humanely done.
I'm sorry to leave "The Times."
There are a lot of unemployed people out there,
many people are half idle and many people are scared.
And I have to remind myself every day that I'm one of the lucky ones.
The main effect is only this restlessness
that surrounds newspaper business
Mood is very pleasant.
Carr: Share we who work in the media,
life is a drumbeat goodbye speech
with cake sheets and cheap sparkling wine.
The massacre has been left behind an unsuitable toy island,
like the model train welder cars have square wheels. </ P>
Sure, I've been fired < br /> on my day, but always after
I failed to appear at work like a normal person
"Go to treatment," my editor at a magazine in Minneapolis will tell me.
"There's a bed waiting for you."
But at the age of 31,
I still have one year left before hitting the rock base,
a year left from that person, thugs who insult drugs,
before me find it the way to this person,
the one with family and work in "The New York Times."
One day I came from "The Twin Cities Reader" where I work,
Come here to the Skyway Lounge and meet my friend Phil. </ P>
Phil gave me a tube a movie full of coke,
and I will get one gram. I go to the bathroom,
the police hit the door to the kiosk where I am
and say, "You roll a noisy joint, buddy."
And he immediately put me on the wall
and then take me the way like this
and arrive at the block towards Nicollet Mall where the car is parked
The interesting thing about it is that my father works right in the center of the city,
so I'm parked
in handcuffs past shopping...
a shopping center downtown
where my father works.
That is another life.
That is another man.
That's that person.
Not too.
Look, I'm afraid of weapons
and I'm afraid of bats.
I'm really not afraid of anything else.
This is the advantage of having textured life.
I have become a single parent in welfare. It's nothing. </ P>
I was talking to John Hume and he said, "Look,
You don't turn into a large city space columnist.
You are not set to be a media reporter, but that's right.
And your story arrived
and it behooves you
for man up, shows a few sacks
and covers until it's finished. "
And I thought," Do you know what? That's what I will do. "
Welcome, everyone, to another debate from" Intelligence Squared ".
We will debate this motion:
Good to the mainstream media.
There will be a winner and loser tonight,
and you audience will be our judge
I work at "The New York Times."
We have 17 million people who come to our website.
We issue 100 videos every month. We have 80 blogs.
We are fully involved in the revolution
"The New York Times" has dozens from bureaus around the world,
and we will throw it away... which is a proposition...
throw it out and kick it back </ p >
and see what Facebook appears.
Carr: I don't think so.
What you will hear tonight is media
needed for the public.
Citizens of information are what this nation is.
That is self-serving nonsense.
"The New York Times" is a good newspaper...
terkadang. "Washington Post" adalah surat kabar yang bagus
The "LA Times," before being a bad newspaper, is a good newspaper.
But after that, it's from the cliff.
This forgotten. The news business in this country
there is nothing to be proud of
The media is a technology business.
That's what That's what always happens. </ P>
Changes in technology, media changes
Over time, viewers have switched to the web. </ P>
The audience is worth the print money
worth a penny and sometimes a penny on the web,
because we end up competing often
for our own work is collected.
"Newser" is a great site and you might want to check it out.
Agregat segala macam konten.
But I want to know if Michael really thinks about it
get rid of the mainstream media content
Good.
Continue .
Remnick: There are many websites,
the core of their very existence... not all of them, but some...
is a repetposed cut by "The Times"
with sexier headlines or a bigger picture
or bounce from "Times" reporting
commenting on "Times" reporting.
Places like "Gawker," what they went for
will give eat it Google-beast algorithm.
They will feed the hit.
And how do we build it really a rich media environment
where you don't lose country house coverage,
Congress is a question.
The big council is the curse of to anyone in "The Times"
or other traditional Daily newspapers.
This lists 10 stories from our site
on large television screens,
which at that time
got the most buzz a lot, distributed
and distributed on the web.
This is equivalent to the front page.
This is the most visible manifestation successful a writer.
We always are very focused on the story
that our readers want.
We don't try to feed them .
We tried to give them what they wanted
I have a friend who in the Albany bureau
from "The Times. " I told him
about the big council, sending it the photo
and "How do you like it? our new innovation?"
He was very scared. Albany corruption story...
they may be important to cover up, but nobody really wants to read it. </ P>
The future can be found elsewhere.
This is a connected economy. This is a search engine.
This is online advertising. This is citizen journalism,
and if you don't can find your way to it,
then you can't find your way.
Nobody covered the police shop, nothing covered the zoning board
The day I met the reporter "Huffington Post"
on the Baltimore zoning board hearing is the day I will...
Senator Kerry, I'm not there When the printing press was found,
but if I'm around, I will imagine
that people face with stone tablets
will make an argument the same
There's no way I can think of it
that you can have a "business model"...
You know, that one < br /> make profit...
for investigative reporting
Vanden Heuvel: ProPublica... very interesting model.
Some of the formula is paired
with legacy media to get the information out
in the most effective way.
Steiger: everything we do continue on our site
But for our biggest story, we get CNN,
a "60 Minutes," a "New York Times"
to work with us
You know, I'm 25, 26 years old in "The Journal."
We really rolling around money
Why are you must open up? for some stories
that you don't know where already
Who knows what kind of germs what happened?
People are open for new ways to work,
because the world has changed.
Vanden Heuvel: There are hybrid models here,
and I think journalism is a public good.
And if it's a public item, then it requires
new mindset < br /> how do you support journalism
1,000 bloggers all talk to each other
don't give you a report from the war zone
Someone must take real risks.
There must be some infrastructure and some pay,
and they have to go and gather the news initially.
Arango: Many people in the Baghdad bureau
moved to Kabul And they asked if there was anyone
who wanted to volunteer for Baghdad,
and so I went to Iraq
Headlam: he was done all of these stories are in media companies
and you know, capital cases and capital punishment.
And the Team is only one from people who wants answers
for very basic questions And I think once you get it
You are curious all kinds of things.
Arango : Iraq is kind of from people's radar screens here,
but we still have 120,000 soldiers there
and that is a very important thing </ p >
in terms of seeing what is the last chapter
for our country there
Headlam: Locals who have worked for us,
some have been killed and kidnapped and... and...
yeah, I'm worried about that
But that's something he wants to do and...
you know, </ p >
Sort of hoping he's fine.
Cheerful, for your good health.
Did they tell you? what do they want you to do?
I mean, there's no knock. It's just that...
did the story that day and...
satisfied with Iraqi staff and write a story, you know
For starters, it will be an election.
You have covered a lot of from other conflicts, right?
Civil war and conflict in Africa.
Somalia... A lot of time in Somalia.
I toured in Yugoslavia when all that happened.
Oh really? The only suggestion they gave was falling into a machine that was managed with this good
It has been going on for seven years and you will find it.
As you probably know, I wish you were on TV in a week. "
" We have been covering this for a while. "
" We have been here for two days thinking... "
It is an honor to work with you. Come back soon.
- Thank you for the kind words. - People: Cheers!
Man: Stay safe
This is history. This is very large Compendium of material
it will affect many people in a different way.
There has been a massive leak.
There are so many pages military secrets are now public.
Some documents tear the cover US-led war effort in Afghanistan:
Unexplained American deaths,
questionable battlefield tactics
and just a mission not going well
Reporter: WikiLeaks released 91,000 raw military documents online,
but this time also up to three traditional news organizations
including "The New York Times, " who examined the material,
he said, eliminating information that could endanger lives. </ P>
Carr: Well, I think that's right /> important moments
chosen by WikiLeaks to pass "Guardian,"
"Der Spiegel" and "The New York Times."
In the sense that they detoxify the information they have,
and they give it < br /> a little more honesty
What Julian Assange realized that
through "The Times"
and "Spiegel" and "Guardian"
will have a greater impact He is right. </ P>
We as a journalistic group...
the four media groups working in this...
just scratching the surface
Carr: We have treated them as an organization advocacy,
but we partner with them
Do we partner?
I think they are a source.
- But they are publishers. - I think they are more like
a source from... okay, you're right
He's not our media partner. He isn't our collaborator.
gives us access to documents.
They can be a source when they are a publisher I think it's very clear.
- We're all together with this. - But you wonder about negotiations,
when they come and say, "You can have this,
but we will give it to another paper,
and all of you will go to hold hands. "Where we say,
" But we are & apos; The New York Times, & apos; and they say,
"But we have all this and we dictate the term. "
You could say that. And so can turn around and say," By the way,
& apos; The New York Times & apos; shouldn't have done this in the first place "?
I was really shocked by a leak, condemning a leak.
There is potential there to endanger American life.
Do you believe there? should be an investigation
into what "The New York Times" violates the law?
I didn't call for the prosecution of "The Times,"
but I think they were guilty bad citizenship
Keller: Basic Calculus < what you are trying to do in your head is a trade-off between its obligations, really,
to inform people about how they were ordered
and on the other hand, government
legitimate needs for confidentiality
I already have a dozen of these cases
Aku sudah punya selusin kasus ini
where we have confidential information
and must decide whether to publish or not
or publish with some the section is cut
p>
Officials at the White House ask us to communicate
to WikiLeaks their strong insistence
that WikiLeaks redact documents and remove
people's names who can be identified
and in danger And we pass it.
The strangest thing in the story, You see, is that "The Times" said
that the White House asked them to lobby WikiLeaks not to print items.
- Headlam: yes - What is really strange
- But also we "The New York Times"... - "This is 1-800-WikiLeaks."
Reporter: Supposedly personal cable details everything
from security threats to dirty diplomatic laundry.
Nothing unpleasant key ally views
Reporter # 2: This is released the biggest diplomatic correspondence ever
Reporter # 3: from highly encrypted telegram to send email messages
for raw, unfiltered analysis from embassies and consulates.
Keller: I still get messages from people who think so
I'm an arrogant bastard.
And I get some from people
who think Julian Assange is messiah
and why am I not Treat him like that?
Carr : Lots of media
who have partnered with WikiLeaks
now find themselves trying to find out
whether this person is a villain or hero.
It would be great if people got it past the debate about WikiLeaks
and disclosure, and see closely on what this is,
which is a real-time history
of US relations with some very important countries.
This is one of the biggest journalistic spoons in the last 30 years
And the fact that "The Times" made it their front page
for weeks showed that, even like all of this writing
became a shadow of from themselves before,
"The Times" is still in the game
and very prominent the game at the moment.
Cohen: Maybe newspapers must complete
using WikiLeaks to get their news
It's not clear what the model is, But I think this is a sign
Openness on that paper There are many more sources.
In many ways This is a very positive step,
even though it's definitely coming at a cost
from a contract traditional newsroom
As Chinese people say, This is a very interesting time.
It's kind of a curse, But it's also a blessing that we live in
at an interesting time... especially if you are a journalist.
You should want it Interesting things happen,
even if it's also a curse.
"New York Time."
Dapatkan "New York Times" Anda!
Come on, check it out. Take a look.
Good morning, "New York Time"?
"New York Times," $ 2. </ P>
"The New York Times" today announced that this will happen
to begin charging for access to the site. </ P>
The system they will adopt says
can see X number from free articles,
and then when you reach X + 1 You will get a message saying
If you want to keep going, you have to pay. </ P>
"The Times" paywall design
this close < br /> to the NPR model,
which is to go to people Who cares most about "The Times"
and say, "You and us, we are partner.
We keep this object on. "
Pérez-Peña: "To this day you have lost daily readers.
If they start charging, I will change this is far from my homepage."
This is my college friend:
"I want to pay, but I don't want to pay
for the information I can easily find elsewhere
Sorry, & apos; New York Times. & apos; Freedom of information. "
I am worried about someone like who is an adult </ p >
in those days where everything is free,
or everything seems free It's never free, but...
The economy of this business always so
ads and payments from readers are needed.
And for the last 15 years on the internet,
We've pretend to be a that's not true.
This is the end of pretending.
They found it through you. They clicked through you.
They came up with stories, the current ones free.
So they are still not paid for it
Usually there are advertisements on the page when they land there.
In many cases, I don't think they get that advertising revenue,
and of course it doesn't cover the cost of doing business.
My view is still very early and that...
Kerry: When you say that early, This isn't the beginning for "The Denver Post"
or "The Seattle Intelligencer" or a group of people
who are facing bankruptcy today.
Information historically not free
You have to pay it in one way or another.
I think what "The Times" says... "This is what is feasible
to read our newspaper every month"... </ p >
will go far to build
What people feel they can pay or maybe what they can't pay.
This is actually a big day in the newspaper business.
And some people may date this, you know,
this is the day all die. We will find out.
The person who made the recipe...
"They have to go do paywall; don't do paywall;
put everything on the iPad; kill paper products "...
run legacy print newspaper business
and try to build online news business
You better hope they find out, because you have 40 years left.
Even if we have our heads are cut,
we only need find out, what is , 15 more years?
Oh, that shit.
I think I have a lot of longer to get away from it.
- really - My life is working or my life?
- How old are you? - 46.
Someone will knock you on the shoulder here at 62, 63,
Thank you very much. Your sheet cake is there. "
- Stelter:" Turn on your tablet. " - Turn your tablet over.
We call it...
... iPad.
Rupert Murdoch: I can catch a glimpse of the future
this weekend with the iPad.
Maybe too, you know, saving the newspaper industry.
Marvin Kalb: And even if it costs the end of the newspaper as we know it...
Well, it's better than them going out of business altogether.
Headlam: Why are media companies? really excited about tablets?
Well, they see it as over-over, they see Like this, they see it like
And then the question becomes, Okay, there are lots of people
who think Apple is saved the music business
They don't save it on music business terms.
There are many people in the music business saying
this is very punishing dealing with people. </ p >
Like, "Oh yeah, they are my best friends
Look at this? It's a rope." What makes people think
it will be different for publishers
That's why I wonder if we will go finally messing up ourselves.
Crowds: < br /> Six, five, four,
three two one.
164 and 232.
One per buyer
It's amazing To be able to cover this,
Because I think in five years
this could be, like, how about that computer
But it's a little scary there, actually
I walked out and people like "Congratulations!"
And like I just had a small child < br /> or I only have twins or something.
You know, I just bought a... I just bought a computer.
Is that a bridge towards the future?
Or... oh wait, this is the gallows!
Ow!
It's true that dreams come true.
Carr: Let's see you navigate. Um, sweet.
That is a good reading experience there
Do you know what reminds me of?
- Stelter: what? - Carr: newspaper
People including me may be silly to think, you know,
Steve Jobs is riding on the hill like a cavalry
to save the industry media.
He drives Apple's stock price.
And maybe so too the same business.
And what is the Venn diagram of interests are...
their interests versus our interests...
That's kind of where the story goes.
I have a lot of great things background conversation,
but I have to move people to the record.
Think of what you might be able to say to me
Alright, bro. Thank you. See you later. </ P>
You know, you can say being on "The New York Times" is a big advantage. </ P>
You know, that kinda scary people when you call them
And I also think I sound it's a bit strange on the phone.
And it's like...
Well, do you have time to talk to me?
Big.
Um, how long have you been? working on the "Trib"?
This is a big story that hasn't been really notified
in this case comprehensive way...
biggest media bankruptcy /> in history,
billions and billions of from the dollar only evaporates,
Many people lose their jobs.
People are still there, you know, good work,
but under very difficult circumstances
from real people don't respect what they do
Headlam: Sam Zell, When he enters, there is someone
without experience running a company like this
There is no news experience Actually, a little insult
for traditional types journalism ideas </ p >
My attitude towards journalism is very simple
I want to make enough money so I can.
It's really simple, okay? You need to help me
by being a focused journalist
on what our readers want. </ P>
Forgive me, forgive me
I can't, you know,
You give me a classic
what I call journalistic vanity
You know, people people inside just sort of become desperate
because the company is run by these people
who doesn't share their value
Hopefully we get to the point where our income
Is so important that we can do
puppies and Iraq, okay? <
Headlam: Sam Zell wants to put him Randy Michaels, who he knows
from the radio business, is responsible for the Tribune Company.
Michaels then goes in and one from the first thing he does
is rewriting company ethics policy
to basically say, "We will be in a much more permissive atmosphere"
and you know, "This will be creative
and anyone goes to be the thing that offends you. "
Do you know what's important the person who bought the ad?
I don't mean the agency. I mean the person who wrote the check. </ P>
They want to sell the widget. They want to move the product. </ P>
They want the cash register to ring. They want
Some people like, "We need something,
so this can be as good as anything." I mean, it's kind of...
You know, this is kind of Salam Mary who is crazy.
So these people enter, buy the company
That's how they behave . This is the result.
Carr: This company, they pushed it into bankruptcy.
Randy Michaels and the crew picked from 20 people
who did he know for a long time has been extracted for a long time
something like $ 100 million bonus.
You can contact that incentive
or you can call it looting,
depends on your perspective.
Yes, let's stop typing altogether
and just chat with us soon.
I have certain memos
the behavior of executives there,
and I just want to make sure that it's true
In this memo sent to the board ,
There was an incident described where Randy Michaels
"berbicara secara terbuka dan keras tentang payudara wanita lain, mainan seks ...
not only in closed rooms with other executives but openly...
He wrote an employee handbook so the kind of conversation that
doesn't violate regulations. " Is that all right?
I mostly did it bankruptcy items,
and then I saw those poker photos
and I think it seems more like
a radio station in the 1970s
than big media companies.
Don't you think it will sell?
and he puts it flat:
Who are they, what they do, and so on.
- All in my first note it - Yeah. </ P>
I did two more weeks of reporting,
maka saya akan mengambil satu minggu untuk menulis dan menunjukkannya kepada Anda.
Carr: Alright.
Stelter: Tonight at 6:30, NBC will drive
in a convoy with combat forces last
when they returned to Kuwait
I don't think we know much about it. We weren't embed,
partly because we think this is a PR action.
What did you make of that idea?
they tried for the choreography to come out here?
In my mind it will be easy just to fly these trucks out.
They've been flying trucks for months
But in fact they want to cross the desert
and bring reporters with them, what does that mean for you?
That's perfect.
Man: So let's start, please, with the media
Headlam: The final battle brigade
in the war will occur to cross the border
to Kuwait, as I understand,
and there are embeds with...
"The Washington Post" is there,
"LA Times," NBC.
And we see if this
kind of final war as we know it.
But this is complicated.
If this is just some kind of photo op... </ p >
I don't understand that this will come from administration
or it comes from, you know, military.
It seems like only...
so far I understand it only comes from NBC
and other embeds.
They need "their mission achieved" moments.
Okay, now what we won't do is predictable, clear,
is what "The Post" and "LA Times" will do with it
Keller: Right, but you know.
Are there any , is the White House, is the military...
who said this is the end of combat soldiers in Iraq?
They say... NBC said they would announce it. </ P>
In other words, NBC will announce it tonight. The implication of NBC is...
But why, < br /> if people know this is coming...
And that's why the White House sent their email.
- Have I seen this anywhere? - No, it's under an embargo. </ P>
This is completely confidential. We are not permitted to talk about it, that's why. </ P>
- When is the embargo broken ? - hopefully 6:30.
Humans: Okay, guys, thank you very much.
Okay, goodbye.
Good night. This has been going on longer than the Civil War,
longer than World War II.
Tonight, US combat forces are out of Iraq
And, Richard, I understand your report about this
at this hour tonight is
the official Pentagon announcement, right
Richard: Yes, right. Now we are together
the last American combat forces </ p >
We're with...
- Are you watching NBC? - Yeah.
I think it's hallucinations. Brian Williams says
for Richard Engel that your report is here from the field
the end of combat forces in Iraq
And nothing Pentagon Announcement
I mean I will end the area you already know
But let me go back. We tried to find out whether...
I didn't know that there was... I mean, I didn't try to be difficult.
- No no No. - Is there some sort of official...?
Thom Shanker in Washington now calls the Pentagon again.
If I don't think of all this day, I will look at this and think,
"What just happened?" </ P>
- I mean... - Headlam: You would think,
Fisherman: So we just heard from Shanker,
who talked to the Pentagon five minutes ago,
and he said there nothing official today
What happened?
Joseph Kahn: If that's the case watching " NBC Nightly News, "
of some kind to commemorate the final end of combat operations.
- That's news to the Pentagon. - Hi, this is lan.
This makes it all the person here is really crazy
I'll leave that to you.
Pentagon or someone call this mission...
That's the mission to cross the border... "Last Patrol."
Fisher: The White House has bad luck said it at the end of the month.
said it's at the end of the month. "
How do you cover it up? a war that doesn't end?
ends with, like, the helicopter leaves the roof of Saigon.
Headlam : Let me start to prepare something
and let's talk again in half an hour. </ P>
So I think we all stand up around trying to find out
is this a real story or a media story,
that isn't really... not too flattering media reporters, isn't it?
" Stand up, we think that actually happened. "</ P>
No, we didn't go to write anything
There are still 56,000 in Iraq,
and the AP records correctly
that all are combat troops
until they are redesignated otherwise,
which actually never happened.
I'm just wondering if...
is our betters going to come tomorrow and say,
"Wow, everything covers this but us? "
Eh, it seems like there is no indication like that
Alright. Good.
So I think we are good okay.
Headlam: I'm going to use my combat helmet just in case.
Carl Bernstein: its function from reporting and press
is the best /> version of the truth
We're not out there to overthrow the government.
We're not out there to be prosecutors.
And that's really what happened at Watergate
Richard Nixon: In the past few months, a member of my government
has been charged with involvement in what has
come to know as Watergate Affair.
We begin covering Watergate story
The day after there was a break-in at the Democratic headquarters,
and we continued to cover it for more than two years.
In the first year,
we wrote more than 100 stories.
Remnick: The story is not one dam is broken
That is story after story after story,
and that is really quite a lot owned by " The Washington Post. "</ P>
Reporter: In the House of Representatives,
There are no left members who think the president will not be fired. </ P>
It hurts me to say it. I grew up with "The Washington Post,"
and you can't say it
that the paper is reduced,
in terms of the scale of his staff
and his ambition, it hasn't affected him.
You will be joking yourself to say it's only cut some fat.
, the economic condition has made it a lower paper.
If that happens in a serious way
to "The New York Times," it will be a terrible tragedy.
Keller: You know, I got a Twitter feed
and read blogs about how media
will or won't cost in the digital age.
But sometimes they seem to have everything comes down to a saying.
I'm not sure that I can boil it all to some kind of "aha."
But I think
there is a sense of growing
of how many it's important if "The Times" isn't here
news organizations that deploy resources
to really gather information is very important
towards a functioning democracy.
It doesn't work if people don't know
When you read "The New York Times "today,
in the business section you will see
obituaries from the newspaper industry.
Jesus, how many pussies!
I'm not a newspaper person. </ P>
I'm a businessman. </ P>
Carr: It's very important to remember
that's the consequence of this bankruptcy
In Los Angeles, in Chicago,
in Hartford, in Baltimore,
the reduction in the newspaper paralyzed or destroyed
important community assets of the community.
Well, that will happen a pretty rough story,
and I want it, uh... fair,
That's why I call you.
I mean if you want me to characterize the whole story,
What I will say is this is a company that overleveraged
hand over this kind turn on the stick to Mr. Michaels.
Michaels brings a guy
from his career on radio to help them.
Overall, many people lose a lot of money
Employees get contributions.
Man on phone: This seems like that
top-to-bottom ax work.
Where... where is the ax?
I'm not... I'm... I'm not...
if there is a reply meeting, um,
I like to talk about it.
If there is a heroic narrative, I like to talk about it.
We haven't even to into cultural issues,
which I'm sure didn't go to please you at all.
Let's cut something a little harder and fast.
On December 11, 2008,
Your board is accepted in a letter... it's anonymous...
accuses a broad pattern sexual abuse
has received oral sex < br /> on the 22nd floor balcony.
He also added that in a meeting
suggested it his assistant entered
and sexually acted
p>
to him to cheer him up.
This isn't 1977. This is 2010,
and things like that
are material for the people it works there
This creates a work environment that people say
closer to the frat house
than media companies front line.
So it's there.
Headlam: 5,459.
Well, that won't happen.
Now every editor and writer thinks they have good stuff,
but he really has good stuff
This is well written, < br /> very very sharply reported
It sticks to facts,
Fantastic quotes from people.
Your board looks in this case ,
ask their law firm to call.
What do they conclude?
Man: I'm trying to find out why is that important
Well, because... because there are people who are out
billions of dollars in debt,
who will decide whether
current management is will stay in place
There are judges who are there will decide whether
they deserve the bonus above table
I will see what I can find and we will come back to you
Okay, you have both of my numbers, so tell me
Headlam : What should I know? before I listen to my message? </ P>
He is willing to start friendship. </ P>
I was raised extensively sexual abuse. </ P>
So when he calls and says I can't get this crap together...
I might have to get this.
- Yeah. < br /> - Alright.
You shouldn't be here.
Bruce Headlam.
How are you?
You have several things go for you
He is one of the most fair-minded people I know
That's one thing.
He is diligent reporter.
We don't do hit work.
That is none of our business.
The story that we are going through, we are guided by reporting.
Let me talk to my boss, see what they think
You talk to your boss, see what they think
And maybe we can see it
a little more feelingless </ p >
You have negotiated this issue is excluded
from everything else. And now suddenly
You want to expand the discussion four hours before we close?
We are interested in getting a response from you
They send a letter
from a law firm
This will stalk the position.
If we say we will go to go with it,
then another letter will be coming from a law firm,
and it will...
contains a threat of legal action.
They are worried this is ax work.
Where are they worried reporting starts,
all things like that.
Institutional muscles
will kick here in some cases.
This isn't really up to me.
Bernstein: We need institutions that have
their ability to be financially good
and culture
to bring news
that other institutions and individuals cannot.
Carr: I think the part of what happens with the conference now
is that some kind of loneliness and scary out there
This is the way for such to gather around the campfire
and say, "We're fine, aren't we?
Are we good
We're fine.
We have to we have a badge. "
- so - What did you do for dinner?
I will eat with AA people
- Oh yeah ? - are you thin
How thin are you?
- 131. - You're short now
- Yeah. < br /> - You used to be like six feet tall.
- At least me. - Will that happen to me?
- Look, my neck has bowed. - Yeah. </ P>
Carr: Thank you very much. </ P>
Welcome David Carr. </ P>
You have lived through cycles worst,
secular recession
publishing business
in modern times
Look around you. < br /> You are still here.
Don't think about people who go
Think about people who made it
This is a very big problem.
This shows, number one,
that you are a group of from tenacious bastards,
I will tell you that
You have proven you cannot be killed
Carr: I always think it is a bit caper
I finally worked on "The New York Times. "</ P>
I don't think I'm destined
to be the best Timesman ever
I just don't want to mess it up
I will feel unspeakable if "The New York Times"
ends where it decreases,
but "The New York The Times " is not necessary
a monolith to survive
Welcome everyone. We are here to note the fact
journalism is still alive and good and full of enthusiasm,
especially at "The New York Times." </ P>
♪ Just like a paper tiger ♪
♪ Cut off by bare hands... ♪
We'll see you soon
♪ Fix yourself when you still can ♪
♪ The desert is below us... ♪
I always find French posters funny American movie
Orson Welles has size 28 waist.
It doesn't look like any reporter I know
or anyone I see < br /> in the cafeteria,
even though we have a salad bar
♪ Like a paper tiger ♪
♪ Di bawah sinar matahari ♪
♪ Look around broken diamonds ♪
♪ To make the past what's supposed to be ♪
♪ Passing ruins and weather ♪
♪ Boats that are enlarged in the sea ♪
♪ The desert is below us ♪
♪ And the storm is above ♪
♪ Like a dog get lost go handicapped ♪
♪ Like a paper tiger ♪
♪ In the sun ♪
♪ We just hold on to nothing ♪
♪ To see how long nothing's going on ♪
♪ The desert is below us ♪
♪ And the storm is above ♪
♪ Like a dog get lost go handicapped ♪
♪ Like a paper tiger ♪
♪ In the sun ♪
♪ There's one way to morning ♪
♪ There's one way to the truth ♪
♪ There's one way back to civilization ♪
♪ But there's no turning back for you.