Oh God!
Oh God... Oh God!
We are in war with an organization that would kill -
- as many Americans they could if we did not prevent them from it.
The drones are effective and have killed a large part of al-Qaeda's leadership.
It's cheap because they do not require strengths on the land.
Can you hit an al-Qaeda leader, is it worth the price?
Do you see this? We have:
One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight grenade throwers.
We have found our mortar man. </ P>
- They got one! North West! - I did not see him. </ P>
On three, two, one. Bum! </ P>
At first I did not fully understand what it would say to kill. </ P>
Det var rædselsfuldt!
Sometimes it just rings in inside one's head.
As much as you imagine, who they were.
We can see the drones. They look like birds.
The drones circle around 24 hours a day.
Two or three at a time. There are always two. Mostly three or four. </ P>
When I or the children hear the drones, we get scared. </ P>
We can neither work nor go to school
When the weather is bad, they will not appear.
My name is Clive Stafford Smith. Hello!
I know that sometimes it may feel like that in Waziristan -
- Because you have drones in the air over you, nobody is on your side.
Jeg er kommet for at fortælle, at det er der altså. Både i UK og i USA.
Why do not they come forward?
We need your help. Most in the UK and in the United States -
- No idea where < br /> Peshawar there. </ P>
We do not know what's happening here. </ P>
We need photos of victims and bits of drone missiles. </ P>
p> When we have a piece of missile who killed your children -
we can prosecute them worldwide.
One of the Requests as the Foundation for Fundamental Rights -
- Present in this case -
- is that the Pakistani Air Force will shoot the drones.
If an American drone flew across my village in England -
- threatening my child, RAF would shoot it down immediately.
I came into this because I represented people in Guantánamo.
When Obama became president, he wanted to close Guantánamo.
That soon realized that he did not care about Guantánamo.
So they just killed people rather than cuddle them.
We had to do something about it. </ P>
A large number of civilians are being killed. </ P>
And it must be documented and investigated. </ P>
If There is no promise, no responsibility -
- It's not a war on terror. It's terrorism!
Our war on terror begins with al-Qaeda.
But it does not end there.
It does not end before every terrorist group around the world -
- has been found, slowed down and defeated.
A few weeks after the attacks 11. September -
- President Bush has secretly granted CIA authority to
to take and kill or kill al-Qaeda people and -
What we have seen in the last 12-13 years -
- is a gradual degradation of the shell -
It has been moved from declared war zones to a shadow world.
It has been a secret warfare <br
- In places like Pakistan and Yemen.
It has never been easier for the president to perform -
a kill mission on the other hand of Earth than it is now.
Define the world as a battlefield, almost all operations can be performed.
The armored drone is the decisive weapon of the war on terror.
The CIA developed the drones in secret.
It's a remote-controlled weapon system, which is often used in remote countries -
- and controlled by satellites by operators in, for example, Nevada, USA.
Opinion makers and politicians can
It has not been possible before.
Therefore, drones have become so important by suicide.
Droner has changed everything. </ P>
We are safer because of our efforts. </ P>
Dozens of al-Qaeda's skilled leaders, bombers and operators -
- has been removed from the battlefield. Short said: Our attack has saved lives. </ P>
An unmanned plane is much better to reduce civilian losses -
- Because we have time to figure out what is happening.
Is the goal correct? Is it really the people we are after? </ P>
It has never been possible before in the history of the war. </ P>
The drones have been effective in could kill senior al-Qaeda people.
However, that does not mean that there are no costs associated with it -
- and the big question To us today is the following:
Is the cost too big relative to the yield?
No one else has told what they have
About how miserable we were treated -
- or the mentality of the people that was in there...
p> It's totally incomprehensible to me.
They are trying to scare others to talk about what they are doing.
Earlier friends have said that they either kill me </ /
I'm not a hero. I'm just a human being.
- Or hope that I'll be charged for high treason and sentenced to death penalty.
- It tells something about the war that nobody wants to hear.
Imagine killing 1500 enemies in war without being on the battlefield.
>
Now Bryant tells it and opens a window for the world -
- to the bunker without windows, where he has worked in recent years.
How did it feel when you saw that piece of paper with 1626 dead people?
How many of them do you think were innocent?
Later Did you say you believed you had killed a child too?
Is the United States and Pakistan in war? No.
in and out in Pakistan? Yes. </ P>
Nowhere is more observed and more bombed by the CIA than Waziristan. Tribes, militants and criminals have always been able to hide in Waziristan -
- You can not find them there.
Waziristan is basically a closed area -
- because Pakistan tries to keep the violence and dangers in there. </ P>
But most in Waziristan are civilians. </ P>
They are not militant! And if we strive -
De er ikke militante! Og hvis vi anstrenger os -
- Can we hear the voices from the people of Waziristan!
Tit tells us something completely different -
- than the United States or Pakistan or the Taliban wants us to believe.
The first documented CIA attack in Pakistan took place in 2004.
The number of attacks has now risen.
>
- every second or third day. It is a systematized killer program. </ P>
Here's a system, how thousands...
And there are thousands, there are have been killed by the drones -
- in secret US operations.
They have not been charged or accused. They have just been killed. </ P>
It must be a requirement that you know who to kill. </ P>
It's not a PlayStation War. It's true life and death.
It's a crime. No civilized laws allow -
- Eliminating suspects, Their families -
- Their wives and children, and that's what happens.
And when everyone is carrying weapons
Nobody knows what's actually happening here in Pakistan.
At least, no one in the West.
But in the tribal areas, they know what happens and they are unfortunately not heard.
I met people from the tribal areas.
One of the things that was said shocked me:
Når folk prøver at undsætte de sårede, kommer der et nyt droneangreb.
It was thought that those who wanted to help others were militant.
He said you could hear the wounded cries for hours -
Because nobody's out to help them.
Pakistan people pay the prize for the outcome of war on terror
- is an explosion of fanaticism.
The Government of Pakistan is co-accomplice in this crime.
Our government submits American interests -
instead to serve the Pakistani people.
Throughout Waziristan, mothers and sisters have been cold-blooded murdered.
Since the attacks began, are thousands of children have become mentally ill.
The impact of the drones on everyday life is great, and especially the children are scared.
I started this in 2010 when I got a civilian victim as a client.
He had lost his son and brother, and I sent a legal claim on his behalf
Now more civilian families came across
- which would go the way.
Now we have contact with hundreds of innocent civilian victims
All families want justice.
Pakistan ignores its duty to protect citizens against drone attacks.
So, we try to push Pakistan /> Government to account for -
why it does not defend justice to the lives of the citizens of Waziristan.
While I was educated, I said to the 11th Air Force Commander -
- I did not think I could shoot anyone and kill someone.
He replied, "You have made oath! You must keep it oath."
And I believed that.
I thought
The daily routine of the work was...
People thought that just pressed a button.
You are in war. You are not in war. </ P>
But when I left there, I still was in war. </ P>
My post-traumatic stress proved
- As a manic need to do better.
I flew more trains than anyone else -
because I felt guilty and therefore I assumed more responsibility.
Everyone with concerns was told to & npos; shut up and parental orders.
<p </ P>
If you wanted to talk to a psychologist, they said:
"Then your security approval will be canceled."
It scared many. But we had to talk with the leader.
And the most common answer was : "It is part of God's plan."
This is the air force's air force.
With the arsenal. The eskadril mark is on the right shoulder.
This is MAJCOM, which shows our air combat status.
Did you have this one on ? /> at a higher level of operations.
It has not been promoted for two years. It stinks.
I did not know what it was or What the Creech Air Force Base was.
I did not get 20 when I realized what I should. Everything was brand new. </ P>
Jeg var ikke fyldt 20, da jeg indså, hvad jeg skulle. Alt var helt nyt.
Jeg syntes, det var helt vildt fedt!
I would like to play PC games all day , but then hit the reality.
One might kill someone.
In the control room, they had a picture <
They are here to die! The guys deserve to die!
And you have to make sure that it happens.
p> I was on my way home. </ P>
My brother is buried at the graveyard. </ P>
When the attack took place, I worked out in the field.
Everyone yelled and screamed.
My mother stood outside and ordered vegetables when she was attacked.
The children got injured during the second attack.
A fragment from the missile got stuck in my leg.
p> I was taken to hospital.
It was only when I was taken home from the hospital -
- I was told that My grandmother had been killed.
It was a terrible day. It felt like the world's demise.
I think a lot about why they kill us innocent people.
Everything has changed. We do not go to school and do not play anymore. </ P>
There has always been a connection between war and entertainment.
The phenomenon I call & apos; militainment & apos; The military world -
retrieving tools from entertainment to make their work better.
The military has invested in computer games -
- which they use to recruit
How do we find our 18X pilots? There have been many theories.
Can you answer that, you can earn a lot of money
We try to find out where we find the best for unmanned airplanes.
And how to find them early.
Players have some skills -
- which is very important, and make the drone operators better.
When I talk about it, I say: "We do not have the Top Gun & Apos; pilots.
We need the & npos; Nerds revenge & apos;."
It's a completely different youth group we are doing.
As we push into this killer environment.
We have something in the military, as we call "warrior".
It hurts when you go out and kills and is totally in vain.
Drone
The difference between killing for the state after general war theory -
- and killing the state without risk -
- is the difference between killing in a recognized and legal manner -
and murder!
How have we gone < br /> warriors to become murderers?
Welcome home! Welcome home!
Politicians want to fight easier wars.
Politically speaking, wars
War where the citizens are not exposed to the danger of the front.
So, wars from distance.
The longer away from the victim -
the more likely we are to be brutal.
It has been proven by psychologists for many years through experiments.
We know that is the case. Distance creates indifference.
And that has not been taken into account -
when we speak drone attacks: distance psychology.
Whether sought or not, from the military industrial complex.
I am annoyed by the propaganda from Baghdad that we shoot civilians.
p> We've been fantastic!
Whether you're with us, or you're with the enemy.
It's a targeted effort against all Qaeda and similar groupings. </ P>
War is an inconvenient profitable business. </ P>
The major defense providers are giant. </ P>
And there are few in each country -
- who have close ties to their governments.
And some of the defense providers actually have
- Copyright to some of the games being produced.
So what they actually do in their sales strategy is -
- Trying to make the weapon in this form of war -
- Part of our everyday life.
We want to tell the world, that we is innocent.
We are being treated gravelly, and our innocent children are being killed.
It is indisputable that the United States does in Waziristan is a criminal. </
It's definitely illegal. And it's our job to reveal it.
I would like to be invited to your village along with Imran.
But we need a guarantee from the Pakistani government -
- and from the Americans that they do not kill us.
I think we should organize a protest march. </ P>
We can either go to Islamabad or to Peshawar and organize a march. </ P>
One thing that always makes me mistrustful is when my government says -
- We can not see what they are doing.
We must have the truth out of Waziristan so that people can see it.
p> Up to now, approximately 3,000 have been killed.
We want to put an eye on as many victims and wounded as possible -
- and bring a case to <br /
It is Noor who organizes it.
I would suggest taking pictures by some of the village children -
- and put them on the rooftops -
- so the American drones with their cameras -
- see the children they are going to
So instead of just seeing dusty buildings, they see children.
It gave me a sense of power.
Når jeg havde de skiderikker i trådkorset, kunne jeg dræbe dem.
And it's...
It was so easy. It was way too easy!
You never know who to kill
It is easy to have the distance and lack of empathy for human life.
It's not human. It's terrorists.
Every time you go
By many of the shots you respond to others' command...
But they do not die It's not a burden they must carry.
It's me who's going to bear that burden. It's the pilot & apos;.
And he is the Operation Manager. </ P>
But they should not shoot and live with the consequences -
- if we hit is quite another -
- and we
They will not live with.
But I will.
We are the ultimate wonder.
I'm looking at a person, and he does not know.
Nobody discovers -
- and We get orders to kill those people.
At first, I did not understand what it would kill.
It was terribly.
We are looking at this... on these people.
And... almost immediately it was said:
And then we fire the missile.
And the security observer counts down. He counts down to zero.
And then he says: "Splash!"
And I saw a man bleed.
The missile had torn his one leg just over her knee.
And I saw him bleed out of the thigh artery -
- and he rolled around the ground and I could...
I imagined his last moments.
I did not know what to feel. Only I had finished anything...
... I was not entitled to finish.
But I had done oath.
I did what I expected.
I implemented it.
And the observer laughed and climbed my back and said:
"You should have seen the set it gave you when i shouted & apos; Spask! & apos "
He laughed like it was the world's best joke.
People handed each other hands, strangely enough, and hit each other on their shoulder.
They did not even have any share in it.
Everybody congratulated each other with a well-executed job.
I went. </ P>
Motorway exit goes down to a traffic light. </ P>
It's a regular cross, <br /
It just did not change! It was red all the time.
All other light curves became green, but my change was not red.
I felt as if I was stuck.
I was stuck where I
I'm trying to travel to the areas with drone attacks and take pictures.
I will collect evidence and show the world what's going on.
There are always people who are panic leaders after family members.
People cry, mothers are crying.
A lot of people have become mentally ill -
- because you attacked Jirgas, shops and schools. </ P>
There are no places that do not <
The drone attack took place in August 2010, which was very terrible.
There were children on earth who were hit by the attack.
Your parents... They were still on earth the following morning.
Never forget that sight.
Three children survived.
The pressure wave from the drone attack threw them out to the side.
The worst of the attack where the children recognized their brothers.
They said, "It's my brother, and it's my brother."
The children could not
Every time I fall asleep, I hear the children's scream.
Almost everyone from the West asks me -
- how many civilian victims there are. /> But all those killed are civilians -
- where are the evidence that they should be terrorists? </ P>
The whole West has as its starting point, That you are innocent. Until their innocence is proven.
The CIA does not say to Congress: "Here is a list of those we have liquidated -
- and here we are not liquidated."
People must understand that drones did not cause major civilian losses.
The actions must not be approved. No one can be held responsible for them.
p> Most attacks have been extremely accurate -
- and targeted at al-Qaeda and their supporters.
We kill many innocent civilians -
- and we push people into their arms groups -
- like Lashkar-e-Taiba, al-Qaeda and so on.
How can we win if for every four we killer do we create ten?
This surgical accuracy, is the possibility of laser vision -
- eliminating the cancer tumor by the name of al-Qaeda terrorist
- while limiting the damage to the tissue around it -
- making this anti-terrorist weapon so important.
It does not matter where exactly the weapon is -
- if the intelligence behind the target is inaccurate, which they are. </ P>
At best are wrong in 40% of cases.
Whatever the exact weapon, you have killed innocent people.
Are you in a terrorist when killed?
is the assumption that you yourself are also terrorist -
- although we do not know who it is.
Is not part of the answer on your claims?
I do not have one...
I do not want to get into the details in the process by which... </
... the decisions are taken.
The legal status of a legal state is transparency and responsibility -
- and the government continues -
- and did not want to make anyone responsible.
- has been performed by CIA.
The most secretive of the United States intelligence services -
- protected by a giant law complex.
No matter what the CIA is involved in, we really need to know something.
An important obstacle to transparency was the transfer -
- Targeted killing via drones to an intelligence agency -
- where accountability can not happen.
But the United States is currently moving to move
There lies a lie hidden inside that truth.
And the lie is
- It has always been the missions.
The CIA may be the customer, but the Air Force has always been in charge of it. .
CIA er måske nok kunden, men luftvåbnet har altid stået for det.
"I can not say what I'm doing but it's super secret."
Eskadrille 17 is Area 51, isolated on a single base. </ P>
It is widely known that CIA controls their mission. </ P>
Just before I left Creech, they set up a big fence. </ P>
You could not see the entrance or the parking lot. </ P>
You do not even know who is in there.
People are talking people are talking.
How secretly it was and how much rob they kicked -
- when the killed terrorists.
The CIA stamp was an excuse for not to inform about it.
It has always been the meaning.
The it will not change. In every thing we can not see.
Det laves der ikke om på. I hvert ikke noget, vi kan se.
It has been a public secret all the time -
- and no one asked the natural question: "Who controls the drones?"
And now it appears that the conventional American Air Force -
has flown CIA's drones all the time.
Why is it important? Yes, The CIA is a civil intelligence agency. </ P>
It's not a part of the military -
- and both the Bushs and Obama governments have used - </
- to get rid of things that the military could not do.
The completely changing our understanding of the dronning war.
And it will make fundamental legal questions -
- US's use of secret attacks in countries like Pakistan and Yemen.
- til USA's brug af hemmelige angreb i lande som Pakistan og Yemen.
There is a term & amp; Title 50, which is the highest secret level -
- that CIA operators can get.
It protects the CIA- agents against prosecution.
But the question is: How protected are these Air Force & Pilot Pilots & apos;
There will be a lot of questions about the way in which the attacks have been committed.
We have the United States Air Force, that controls the drones.
The CIA is responsible for the attacks.
Cent Com helps to identify goals
The National Geospatial Agency delivers information -
- about buildings and locations and do all the card work.
- om bygninger og lokationer og laver alt kortarbejdet.
The president then privately signs the death lists.
The entire government device has been adapted -
The targeted killings over the last ten
This is not the CIA. It is the United States in a broad sense -
- It is responsible for this. It's part of a
I believe that the United States must remain a banner leader.
- when it comes to warfare.
That's what
People in Waziristan, here we come!
For eight years, our sisters and brothers have been attacked.
Opposition politician Imran Khan opens a demonstration against US drones -
- along with hundreds of followers in Islamabad.
Now there are also people from the United States and the United Kingdom.
International peace activists hope to lead march into Southwaziristan.
I had a very specific goals:
Get as many activists and human rights people as possible -
- into Waziristan and get them safely back.
It was about focusing on the case with civilian victims -
- in a broader perspective, telling the story. </ P>
The authorities are discouraging us They say it's dangerous.
But they are just afraid of the effect our work will have.
So it's a clean farce.
What do you say to the campaign?
It's great to be here with all these people.
And the most important are you from the media -
- the purpose is to get the message out in the world
- about what's going on in Waziristan.
Waziristan, are you ready?
>
This brave man will help us. Welcome to Clive Stafford Smith! </ P>
Thank you. Thank you very much. Let me start by saying -
- Until the United States sees your children as they see my children -
No more drones! No more drones!
The last days have been very good -
No more drones!
Because they have created debate worldwide.
... we've killed so many. But what with the innocent? You do not belong. </ P>
The use of drones violates Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity. </ P>
It is not entitled to attack in a non-international armed conflict.
If anyone wanted to hit me with a war crimes hammer in my mind
Unpowered innocent civilians are a clear breach of international law.
>
- could they do that? </ P>
Firstly, how does achieve transparency? </ P>
We must understand why these People are killed.
In the cases we have documented, the United States must explain what went wrong.
- They agreed on the requirement for more transparency.
It has never happened before at the UN General Assembly.
The United States officially says
Ladies and gentlemen: Brandon Bryant is a former drone operator.
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen, to make my vote...
... be heard in this very important debate.
As a former drone operator -
There should be independent investigations and transparency -
- about responsible use of any weapon system that can kill.
There should be heavy reasons for taking a human life.
And I think it should be considered
- very, very objectively.
Thank you
I hope my report about my experiences
transparency about the government and the drones program.
Maybe I just hate the excuse because because it's CIA -
- We do not need transparency. Because it's a piss! </ P>
Today, we see something quite unusual:
A Pakistani family who is a victim for a drone attack at Capitol Hill. </
We've been trying to get civilian victims for drone attacks to the United States.
It's important because they represent many others in the same situation.
- whose voices we now hear.
I do not love the blue sky anymore. I prefer the gray.
Drones do not fly when the sky is gray.
In a short period of time one can stop being scared.
But when it gets up, the drones come back and the same does fear.
The Peshawar Supreme Court has stated -
that the drone attacks are contrary to Pakistani and international law.
If the United States, after a warning continues the drone attacks - / p>
- Pakistani military duty to shoot down the drones.
The Peshawar Supreme Court judgment completely changes -
the view of drones in Pakistan, for Peshawar's judgment makes clear -
that drone attacks are illegal and an violation of Pakistan's sovereignty -
- and by international law.
So the prime minister must now tell the United States to quit -
- And if they do not, it's his duty to shoot the drones.
If he does not, we appeal to him for trial.
It's regrettable that out-of-court killings are becoming quite normal.
It's not a world, I might want to live in.
>
Unfortunately, we're on the way to a world -
- where the law does not matter.
Those who have power, apply
If the law has unlimited power in ave, the question is not -
- if the American droned rob is legal. The real questions are:
Do we want a world where the government's right to kill -
The United States, the Greatest Superpower of the World and Human Rights Warranty -
- Violates a fundamental right: the right to live.
And the do so by invoking a dangerous legal authority -
- which undermines international law.
The rules should apply to everyone.
If we bend the rules for the United States -
- they must understand that the same rules will also be used -
- in other parts of the world at risk
There has never existed any war technology -
ultimately being used by one's enemy or enemies.
It's only a matter of time before we have a drone over New York City -
Er det kun et spørgsmål om tid, før vi har en drone over New York City -
- Looking down Manhattan? A drone who is not ours?
I've determined that 87 countries have drones.
It has been mentioned as an American phenomenon -
- but when 87 countries have them, it's no longer an American phenomenon. </ P>
England is ready to test a new supersonic...
... the coating is crucial for the queen's efficiency.
How much drones use
We have only seen the beginning.
War is the most serious decision a government can take.
Now we have technology that lets us carry out the actions of the war -
- without having to think about the political consequences -
send people's sons and daughters to the front.
It's great at the micro level.
But at the macro level it can change that way -
Politicians are watching war and where and when
There is a real risk that we undermine the entire structure -
- and not only make the war more likely -
- but also to a permanent state without geographical boundaries.
And it has consequences.
The United States has become a security state, whose existence is war.
We have created a terrorist-industrial complex, which is self-preserving -
- and in a search for a reason Permanent War -
- Terrorism is perfect for us. We can stay on forever.
- See...! - Look up!
There's the dron! See it straight!
We have been working for hundreds of years to develop a law system -
- and that system should not be the first victim of the battle we have now. <
There is a real danger that we are on our way into the drone age -
- and it's a science fiction-like nightmare!
We go into it with eyes closed and people just do not see what's happening.
It seems like we're in a bad one science fiction novel.
People want inhuman war -
- creating robots, who can do the work for them.
If we inhuman war -
- What should prevent us from sending robots into another country?
- and let them destroy the entire population?
/ p>
And we see it happening right now...
Danish texts: Allan Hilton Andersen Danish Video Text